The jews and the Justified Murder of Gentiles – Part 1

“Revenge and the behavior of measure against measure is necessary and important in war … both in harming innocents and babies in a cruel form of war in measure against measure.”

 Voice of Germania  August 19, 2023 7 min read 

In 2009, the “King’s Torah” (תורת המלך) appeared, written by Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur.  Both are israeli rabbis.  Shapira was known for his involvement in the arson of a Palestinian mosque in the village of Yasuf, while Elitzur was an advocate of “price tag” attacks and was convicted in an israeli court for inciting violence.  The word “torah” can be translated as “doctrine”, “instruction”, “teaching”, or “law”.  A “torah” is therefore a set of laws and principles on which jewish philosophy is based.  This particular “torah” discusses the question of killing – 230 pages of such discussion.  The focus of this discussion outlines differences in the rules of killing based on one’s status as a jew or a gentile (גוֹי – pronounced “goy”).

Cover of the “King’s Torah”

We present a brief selection of quotes from this “torah”:

“A jew who kills a gentile does not have to die.”

“A gentile is judged in one favor, in one judgment and without notice; Therefore, the person who knows a gentile who has transgressed one of the seven commandments can judge him and kill him.”

Here the “seven commandments” refer to the seven noahide or noachide laws.

“Revenge and the behavior of measure against measure is necessary and important in war … both in harming innocents and babies in a cruel form of war in measure against measure.”

“According to the Maharal, it is permissible to harm all the people of a certain kingdom if the people of that kingdom harmed our kingdom – since all the people of the kingdom are considered as one body.”

This refers to rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel, also known as rabbi Loew, also known as the Maharal.

Upon reading the last two quotes it is clear how the enemy justified their unrestricted method of war against Germany.  The famous headline “Judea Declares War on Germany” printed in the Daily Express on March 24th, 1933 is very telling.  According to jewish leaders, this declaration was justified since the Germans were “harming” jews – that is not allowing them to continue their parasitical behavior.  After the war was declared, it was justified to kill women and children in unrestricted warfare.  This is jewish law.

In more recent times, we see the same pattern.  The jew Madeleine Albright, when confronted, completely justified the death of Iraqi children as a result of the U.S. embargo stating that it was “worth it”.  The “war on terror” justified the murder of women and children.  Now we have a war on “white supremacy” and we see how this is going.  Again and again, the pattern never changes.

According to the knowledge that one has of the enemy, one may rightfully object and claim that we are “beating a dead horse” in the sense that the doctrine of the enemy is already well known.  Why do we wish to revisit the topic again?  The vile ideas are already in the talmud and besides, the “King’s Torah” is old news that has already been denounced by certain elements of the jewish community.  For example:

Rabbi’s book says Jews can kill gentiles – Jewish Telegraphic Agency (

Involvement in arson attack leads to Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira’s arrest | The Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle (

Torat Hamelech | Reform Judaism

חדשות – יהדות nrg – …ספר שמופץ בימין מסביר מתי מותר להרוג (

So, there are “good jews” who have already denounced this work, right?  Everyone knows a “good jew”!

We notice that neither Shapira, nor Elitzur were ever actually punished for their activities.  Elitzur got the worst of it – a five month suspended prison sentence.

Adolf Hitler in “Mein Kampf” describes the situation quite well:

The more I debated with them the more familiar I became with their argumentative tactics. At the outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents, but when they got so entangled that they could not find a way out they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should they fail, in spite of their tricks of logic, they acted as if they could not understand the counter arguments and bolted away to another field of discussion. They would lay down truisms and platitudes; and, if you accepted these, then they were applied to other problems and matters of an essentially different nature from the original theme. If you faced them with this point they would escape again, and you could not bring them to make any precise statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these apostles one’s hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a solid mass a moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to give in to your argument, on account of the observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on the following day. The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened. Should you become indignant and remind him of yesterday’s defeat, he pretended astonishment and could not remember anything, except that on the previous day he had proved that his statements were correct. Sometimes I was dumbfounded. I do not know what amazed me the more–the abundance of their verbiage or the artful way in which they dressed up their falsehoods. I gradually came to hate them.

So it appears that the enemy, as always, talks from both sides of the mouth and engages in an apparent internal debate on what judaism actually stands for.  After a bit of hand-wringing, the discussion of the “King’s Torah” and the activities of the authors and their associates die.

Never mind that Shapira and Elitzur were strictly following talmudic law.  Do the jews ever denounce the talmud itself?  No, of course not!  If any questions arise which portray judaism in a negative light, the answer always comes down to “misunderstanding the context” or other similar statements.  On the contrary, the talmud is widely promoted these days and jews are encouraged to study it carefully.  Gentiles are led to believe that it is a profound collection of writing from “wise jewish sages”.  So the “liberal” jews may throw a few stones at Shapira and Elitzur but they will never call out their sources (such as the talmud) for what they are.  Here are a few examples of this – even NPR, the government-sponsored media of the United States, gets in on the action.

What Is the Talmud? | My Jewish Learning

Get Your Daily Dose of Talmud | My Jewish Learning

After digitizing the Talmud, Sefaria seeks to do the same to democracy – The Jerusalem Post (

In the new Daf Yomi cycle, daily Talmud study is reaching new populations – Jewish Telegraphic Agency (

Orthodox Jewish Women Take A New Lead In Talmud Study In Israel : NPR

The enemy never lets ancient history die.  They still celebrate passover and purim, both of which are nothing more than celebrating the death of their enemies – including women and children.

The stream of holohoax-themed books, documentaries, and movies never ends.  The rhetoric of the “evil deeds” perpetrated by our European ancestors never ends.  The jewish propaganda machine tirelessly beats the same “dead horse” with outright lies and distortion of facts.  We must admit that the strategy has been quite effective.

Consequently, we should not allow the story of this recently written “torah” to fade away.  Everyone around the world should know the names “Ytzhak Shapira” and “Yosef Elitzur” as well as their work.  Everyone around the world should know that they were following the true jewish law.  Everyone around the world should know that their statements will directly affect us all as many national governments around the world together with the UN have casually accepted the principles of the “noahide laws”.  We should not allow them to let this history die.  We should not allow them to pretend that the talmud is a wonderful book of deep philosophy.  We should not allow them to forget “yesterday’s defeat” as Hitler so aptly puts it.

To our knowledge, the “King’s Torah” so far has not been translated into English and no gentile has closely examined this book and its content.  We put together a team for this task.

In this series of articles, we propose to address the following points:

  1. We will demonstrate that Ytzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur are not shadowy figures on the “extreme right” but are in fact well-connected with admirers in high places. They and their colleagues are well funded – a portion of this funding can be traced back to the United States.
  2. We will go through the “King’s Torah” and present an overview chapter by chapter.
  3. We will examine how the statements in the “King’s Torah” are truly following jewish law so that rabbi Shapira and rabbi Elitzur should be recognized as great jewish leaders.
  4. We will call out the fallacy of the opposition to these two rabbis. Instead of the verbal gymnastics, the jewish leadership should renounce their beliefs at the core.  Nothing less than this is acceptable!  The only “good jew” is the one who has completely renounced judaism without a fake conversion to some other religion or clever words.
  5. We will examine the noahide laws and what they imply in view of statements made by Shapira, Elitzur, and other prominent rabbis.
  6. We will get into the promotion of the noahide laws perpetrated by various government officials and non-jewish religious leaders. Do these leaders actually realize what they are endorsing for every non-jew who is not essentially a “shabbos goy”?  The enemy classifies the followers of practically every other religion as “idolaters”, thus violating the noahide law, thus deserving death.
  7. We are certain that the continued examination of this topic will bring us one step closer to the UTTER DEFEAT OF THIS ENEMY!
  8. Source: